home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc
- Path: cix.compulink.co.uk!usenet
- From: jralph@cix.compulink.co.uk ("Jolyon Ralph")
- Subject: Re: What I want from new Workbench
- Message-ID: <DoF1EG.D2x@cix.compulink.co.uk>
- Organization: Compulink Information eXchange
- References: <956.6649T764T1139@Redrobe.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Sun, 17 Mar 1996 14:25:28 GMT
- X-News-Software: Ameol32
-
- > >Please, not like AFS... I've heard some real horror stories!
- >
- > Once you use it, you won't go back to FFS though...
-
- I must admit I've never felt anything was fundamentally wrong with FFS,
- certainly not anything bad enough to justify spending the better part of
- รบ70 to make it go a little faster.
-
- There seem to be many people who are AFS fanatics here, and many who are
- die-hard AFS haters.
-
- As far as I'm concerned, if it adds to the costs that AT will have to
- bear for the next OS generation, forget it, there are much better things
- to spend the money on like including a disk repair/recovery/undelete
- program , like AmiBack Tools, as standard. Don't say you'll never need
- that for AFS. AFS 'prevents' one particular kind of hard disk crash from
- happening. It most certainly can't prevent every possible way for hard
- disk data to be corrupted.
-
- Jolyon
-